Morris E. Turek

(314) 749-4059

morris@yourtrademarkattorney.com

  Google Plus Facebook Twitter 
YouTube YouTube

Trademark Attorney Morris Turek Featured
on KPLR-11 St. Louis!

Watch Morris' interview on KPLR

Watch Morris on All About Business

What are People Saying about Morris?

“Morris has been handling my software company\'s intellectual property matters for the last few years. He has consistently proven himself reliable, affordable, timely, honest, friendly, empathetic, and exceptionally knowledgeable. Morris is the go-to individual for trademark issues big or small.”

- Kevin O’Neil, Candywriter, LLC
“We hired Morris to advise us for trademark concerns relating to our corporation. He was able to explain what was needed, how the process would work, and the value of having these legalities covered. We will be using Morris again in the future and would recommend hiring him. He is a true professional and extremely reliable.”

- Doug Belleville, STL Beds, Inc.
“Morris is outstanding. His work is excellent. He\'s on time every time. He\'s trustworthy and delivers on his word. His communications are detailed, thorough, and clear. His prices are reasonable. He\'s very accessible, responsive, professional, and one of the most decent people I\'ve ever had the pleasure of meeting and doing business with. I\'ve enjoyed working with him for the past two years and I fully anticipate working with him for many years to come.”

- Barry Kepp, Nova Innovations, LC
“Morris did our trademark at Proforze. He walked us through the whole process and answered all of our questions promptly We were very satisfied with both the quality and cost of the work and are looking to hire Morris again to do another trademark for a branding project at Proforze. I would recommend Morris if you have any trademark work you\'re looking to outsource.”

- Jacqueline Walker, Proforze, Inc.
“I consider trademark and copyright a specialty and I need Morris’ services to make sure that our logos and our trade names are all protected. He’s thorough, and because he concentrates on that, I know the job is done right.”

- Eric Stuhler, Chief Counsel, Lindenwood University

Do All Trademarks Receive the Same Amount of Protection?

Trademarks are categorized by their distinctiveness or, in other words, their relative ability to distinguish your particular products and services from those offered by your competitors.  The more distinctive your trademark is, the broader scope of protection it receives and the easier it is for you to register your trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The strongest trademarks are those that are “fanciful.”  Fanciful trademarks are typically comprised of coined terms that have no English language meaning.  Some very well-known fanciful trademarks include EXXON, XEROX, KODAK, and BUICK.  Fanciful trademarks are considered inherently distinctive and are eligible for federal trademark registration.  The biggest drawback to adopting a fanciful mark is that it can take a lot of advertising and marketing for consumers to finally associate the trademark with the product or service being offered.  This is because you are essentially teaching consumers a brand new word for which they have no existing frame of reference.

Just slightly below fanciful trademarks on the distinctiveness scale are “arbitrary” trademarks.  Arbitrary marks consist of common English language words applied in an unfamiliar manner.  Probably the most famous example of an arbitrary mark is APPLE for computers and electronic devices.  Obviously, the dictionary definition of “apple” (a type of fruit) has nothing to do with these types of products.  As with fanciful trademarks, it can take a substantial amount of time and money to create a connection in the minds of consumers between the trademark and the product/service being offered.  Arbitrary marks are also considered inherently distinctive and are eligible for federal trademark registration.

The next level down are “suggestive” trademarks.  Suggestive trademarks are extremely popular because they suggest to consumers a favorable feature, quality, or characteristic of the product or service with which they are used.  Some good examples of suggestive trademarks are COPPERTONE for suntan lotion, GREYHOUND for bus transportation services, and JAGUAR for sports cars.  Suggestive marks are considered inherently distinctive (although less so than arbitrary and fanciful trademarks) and are eligible for federal trademark registration.

The weakest type of trademarks are those that are “descriptive.”  Descriptive trademarks immediately describe a feature, quality, or characteristic of the product or service with which they are used.  Descriptive trademarks are not inherently distinctive and must acquire “secondary meaning” in the minds of consumers before they are eligible for federal registration.  Secondary meaning may be acquired over time through substantial and continuous use of the descriptive trademark in commerce. BANK OF AMERICA and SPORTS ILLUSTRATED are good examples of descriptive trademarks that have acquired the requisite secondary meaning for federal registration through many years of continuous use.  Needless to say, trademark attorneys tend to advise their clients to stay away from descriptive trademarks since they are initially entitled to only a very narrow scope of protection.

Finally, there are “generic” terms.  Generic terms are not trademarks and they can never be owned or registered by anyone.  For instance, “pet store” for a store that sells pets is a generic phrase that is freely available to anybody who wants to use it in connection with such services.  So, while “pet store” can never be a trademark by itself, FURRY FRIENDS PET STORE would be an example of a suggestive trademark eligible for federal registration.

In conclusion, you should strive to adopt unique and creative trademarks for use in connection with your products and services.  Besides being easier to federally register, owners of highly distinctive trademarks generally have fewer infringement issues and are often in a stronger legal position should they ever have to pursue a trademark infringement lawsuit against someone else.