<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hormel Foods vs. Spamrobin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-927/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-927/</link>
	<description>Trademark Registration &#38; Litigation Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-927/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=10#comment-28</guid>
		<description>&quot;I bet that the $600 it cost Hormel in government filing fees to challenge the SPAMROBIN application is likely just about equal to the revenues Hormel has earned from the sales of its vile SPAM product over the 70 years it has been in existence.&quot; 

If it wasn&#039;t for Hawaii&#039;s unnatural fascination with the stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I bet that the $600 it cost Hormel in government filing fees to challenge the SPAMROBIN application is likely just about equal to the revenues Hormel has earned from the sales of its vile SPAM product over the 70 years it has been in existence.&#8221; </p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t for Hawaii&#8217;s unnatural fascination with the stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-927/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=10#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&quot;Gelatinous tinned pig&quot; -- I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Gelatinous tinned pig&#8221; &#8212; I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-927/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=10#comment-4</guid>
		<description>As a connoisseur of fine midwestern fare, I can say with confidence that just about anything, including computer software, would taste better than SPAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a connoisseur of fine midwestern fare, I can say with confidence that just about anything, including computer software, would taste better than SPAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

