<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week &#8211; 12/06/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-120609/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-120609/</link>
	<description>Trademark Registration &#38; Litigation Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-120609/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=54#comment-88</guid>
		<description>As a proud member of this organization (fraternity), I understand the watchmaker&#039;s concern.  One one hand, we too have a problem with unregistered vendors hawking products in the name of Omega.  They flood our conventions, and return none of their profits for the community service to which we pledge; on the other hand however, to take litigation to such extremes is both petty and just plain sad.  If anything, my affinity for &quot;Omega&quot; has lent to an appreciation in the coffers of the Swiss watchmaker, not an affront to. 

I currently am the owner of a Broad Arrow Speedmaster (in the absence of my fraternal affiliation, I would not have otherwise given a second thought to purchasing), and I&#039;m not the only one... for now.  

Check ebay under the seller name &quot;Mad Que&quot; for a great deal on a slightly used timepiece manufactured by a watchmaker that has surgically incised their collective noses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a proud member of this organization (fraternity), I understand the watchmaker&#8217;s concern.  One one hand, we too have a problem with unregistered vendors hawking products in the name of Omega.  They flood our conventions, and return none of their profits for the community service to which we pledge; on the other hand however, to take litigation to such extremes is both petty and just plain sad.  If anything, my affinity for &#8220;Omega&#8221; has lent to an appreciation in the coffers of the Swiss watchmaker, not an affront to. </p>
<p>I currently am the owner of a Broad Arrow Speedmaster (in the absence of my fraternal affiliation, I would not have otherwise given a second thought to purchasing), and I&#8217;m not the only one&#8230; for now.  </p>
<p>Check ebay under the seller name &#8220;Mad Que&#8221; for a great deal on a slightly used timepiece manufactured by a watchmaker that has surgically incised their collective noses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/ridiculous-trademark-opposition-of-the-week-120609/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 02:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=54#comment-50</guid>
		<description>What ever happened with the above case? How did it resolve? How do you deal with such abusive companies that file such a high volume of objections? We just became a victim of this (not from Omega, but from an equally overly-zealous company). How can we defend ourselves given that the marks don&#039;t even look similar? And without spending a fortune in legal bills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened with the above case? How did it resolve? How do you deal with such abusive companies that file such a high volume of objections? We just became a victim of this (not from Omega, but from an equally overly-zealous company). How can we defend ourselves given that the marks don&#8217;t even look similar? And without spending a fortune in legal bills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

