<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week &#8211; Nokia v. Sony Ericsson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/nokia-sony-trademark-opposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/nokia-sony-trademark-opposition/</link>
	<description>Trademark Registration &#38; Litigation Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bajor</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/nokia-sony-trademark-opposition/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bajor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=422#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a more fitting opposition would be one filed by BMW since they are the makers of the X3 and X5 SUVs. No one seems to take up issue with a lack of distinctiveness there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a more fitting opposition would be one filed by BMW since they are the makers of the X3 and X5 SUVs. No one seems to take up issue with a lack of distinctiveness there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

