<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dirt Cheap v. Cheap Cheap &#8211; A Trademark Dispute Sure to Satisfy All Vices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/dirt-cheap-v-cheap-cheap-trademark-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/dirt-cheap-v-cheap-cheap-trademark-dispute/</link>
	<description>Trademark Registration &#38; Litigation Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/dirt-cheap-v-cheap-cheap-trademark-dispute/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=455#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe they were so blatant about it.  They stole a font that&#039;s so unique I&#039;ve never even seen before aside from these companies.  They may as well have gone ahead and adopted the chicken too.  As a follow-up you could feature the former Dirt Cheap spokesman Fred, who probably was advised by a competent trademark attorney before opening Fred&#039;s Cheapo Depot.  Good investigative work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe they were so blatant about it.  They stole a font that&#8217;s so unique I&#8217;ve never even seen before aside from these companies.  They may as well have gone ahead and adopted the chicken too.  As a follow-up you could feature the former Dirt Cheap spokesman Fred, who probably was advised by a competent trademark attorney before opening Fred&#8217;s Cheapo Depot.  Good investigative work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/dirt-cheap-v-cheap-cheap-trademark-dispute/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourtrademarkattorney.com/blog/?p=455#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Clearly, Cheap Cheap should have hired you, or other trademark attorney of similar competence and stature, to advise it of the prudency of adopting such a mark before it opted to use it in connection with its goods and services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, Cheap Cheap should have hired you, or other trademark attorney of similar competence and stature, to advise it of the prudency of adopting such a mark before it opted to use it in connection with its goods and services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

