Trademark Registration

A Trademark for Trayvon: Protection or Exploitation?

Last week, a friend of mine emailed me an article about a trademark issue related to the Trayvon Martin story.  In the event you haven’t heard about Trayvon Martin because you’ve been doing research in Antarctica for the past month, Trayvon was an African-American teenager who was shot and killed in Florida by a neighborhood watch captain who claims he was acting in self-defense.  Trayvon was wearing a hooded sweatshirt and was unarmed at the time he was shot.  The controversial killing has received an enormous amount of media coverage because the shooter has not been arrested by Florida authorities and it appears from a 911 call that he might have provoked Trayvon by following him throughout the neighborhood and approaching him when there was no justification to do so.  The case has understandably sparked public outrage in many parts of the country and has resulted in numerous demonstrations and protests during which participants have chanted such phrases as “I AM TRAYVON” and “JUSTICE FOR TRAYVON.”  These two rallying cries have appeared on t-shirts and hats worn by Trayvon’s supporters, as well as on large signs and banners used during the protests.
Continue reading A Trademark for Trayvon: Protection or Exploitation? →

Legalzoom and Trademark Registration: A Match Made in Hell

Last week, I received a telephone call from a guy located in Florida who was on the verge of opening a new business.  Apparently, he was thinking about using LegalZoom to assist in the preparation and filing of his trademark application.  For those of you who don’t already know, LegalZoom is an online legal document preparation service.  It is not a law firm and it cannot offer any legal advice or guidance.  People who are looking to register a trademark with LegalZoom (God forbid) are asked to fill out a questionnaire that resembles the official trademark application form provided by the Trademark Office.  They submit their responses to LegalZoom with a payment that covers LegalZoom’s service charge and the government filing fee for the application.  Without checking for accuracy or completeness, LegalZoom transcribes the responses onto the Trademark Office’s official application form and submits it on behalf of its customers.  There is absolutely no review by LegalZoom as to whether the trademark is even eligible for registration, which is a problem considering that there are many categories of trademarks that are completely barred from being federally registered.
Continue reading Legalzoom and Trademark Registration: A Match Made in Hell →

Can a Trademark Attorney Guarantee Registration of a Trademark?

A couple of weeks ago, a potential client called me from California wanting to federally register his trademark.  He had already been using it for a few months but never conducted a trademark search prior to adopting it.  Of course, I advised him that it would be a wise idea to at least perform a search of the federal trademark records to see whether there were any existing trademark registrations or pending trademark applications for confusingly similar marks that would clearly prevent the registration of his trademark.  He agreed with my recommended course of action, but then asked whether I offer a guarantee that his trademark application would eventually become a trademark registration.  When I told him that I couldn’t provide such an assurance, he seemed somewhat taken aback.  After all, why would a trademark attorney advise someone to file a trademark application if it isn’t going to be accepted by the Trademark Office?  Well, although a skilled and experienced trademark attorney will certainly give his client an informed opinion as to whether a trademark application is likely to mature into a trademark registration, there are simply way too many variables in the trademark registration process for any attorney to offer an iron-clad guarantee of registration.
Continue reading Can a Trademark Attorney Guarantee Registration of a Trademark? →

Jay-Z and Beyonce Become Proud Parents of a Trademark

This week’s article is about a trademark issue involving two of the biggest names in music and their month-old offspring.  On January 7, Rapper Jay-Z and singer Beyonce Knowles became parents of a precious seven pound bundle of joy.  Like many celebrity couples who think it’s chic to give their children absurd names, they immediately sentenced their sweet little angel to years of ridicule and mockery by naming her Blue Ivy.  Now, I admit it kind of sounds pretty and elegant when her first and middle names are used together, but we all know that everyone is just going to call her Blue.  “Look, Blue blew out the candles on her cake!”  “Why so blue, Blue?”  “Why is the sky blue, Blue?”  I guess the good news is that if she’s ever the requisite conniving shrew on a reality TV show, she has a ready-made nickname.
Continue reading Jay-Z and Beyonce Become Proud Parents of a Trademark →

Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week – Norwood Promotional Products v. Thomas Publishing Company

This week’s article is about the recent antics of Norwood Promotional Products, LLC.  Norwood is a major supplier of imprinted promotional products.  It is probably best known for its line of KOOZIE insulated can and bottle sleeves, but it also offers hundreds of other items on which you can print company names and logos or really anything else you desire.  Did you know that KOOZIE was even a trademark?  Most people just use the term generically to refer to insulated beverage sleeves, but it actually is a registered trademark owned by Norwood.  Although it may not be for long since there is some ongoing litigation about whether KOOZIE has become just a generic word.  But that’s a story for another day.
Continue reading Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week – Norwood Promotional Products v. Thomas Publishing Company →

Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week – Glad Products v. Trans Western Polymers

The Glad Products Company (“Glad Products”) has been using the trademark GLAD since 1962 in connection with the advertising and sale of plastic bags.  If you walk down one of the 25 aisles at your local Walmart (don’t ask me which one), you’ll see that Glad Products offers all kinds of plastic bags for household use, including trash bags, food storage bags, and freezer bags.  Unless you’ve boycotted television over the past twelve years, you are undoubtedly familiar with the DON’T GET MAD GET GLAD slogan featured on many of Glad Products’ commercials.  You know, the ones where someone picks up a generic trash bag and the bottom splits, causing a gigantic mess all over the clean kitchen floor.  I don’t know about you, but I’ve been using generic trash bags for the better part of my adult life and I can’t say that I’ve ever experienced such a breakage.  So, I would encourage everyone out there to save a few bucks a year and purchase the cheapest garbage bags you can possibly find.  Trust me, your social standing with the neighbors and the garbage man will not suffer.
Continue reading Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week – Glad Products v. Trans Western Polymers →

When Trademark Searches Go Wild!

This past week, I conducted a trademark search for a client that reminded me just how wacky and frustrating the Trademark Office can be.  For a variety of reasons, I am not going to reveal the exact trademark I searched.  Instead, I will say that I performed a trademark search on the mark THE CARBON MONOXIDE PEOPLE, which is used in connection with a business that sends trained professionals to your home to test for carbon monoxide leaks.  I can tell you that the client’s actual trademark is extraordinarily similar to the THE CARBON MONOXIDE PEOPLE and that it is used in association with closely related services.

Continue reading When Trademark Searches Go Wild! →

“2012″ Trademarks: Amusing, Interesting, and Presumptuous

First of all, I want to wish everyone a very Happy New Year!  I hope 2012 brings all of you much joy, success, and prosperity.  My New Year’s resolution is to continue building my trademark law practice and to spend more time seeing and learning about the world.  I’m actually going on my very first cruise in July (9 nights!) thanks to the extraordinary generosity of my Aunt Faye and Uncle Steve.  I also want to lose about 15-20 pounds, but I say that every year and it just never seems to happen.  I guess I should just be happy that I’m not gaining 15-20 pounds every year.  Perhaps the July cruise will motivate me to stop gorging myself at the local Chinese buffet.  If the Hibachi Grill Supreme Buffet in St. Peters, Missouri goes out of business, you’ll know why.  If it has record profits, well, there’s always next year…
Continue reading “2012″ Trademarks: Amusing, Interesting, and Presumptuous →

Atlanta Braves File Trademark Opposition Against Disney’s Trademark Applications for “BRAVE”

I almost put this trademark dispute in the “ridiculous trademark opposition” category, but I didn’t want to add insult to injury after the Atlanta Braves’ embarrassing late-season collapse that resulted in the team missing the postseason after leading the St. Louis Cardinals by 10.5 games in the wild card race.  See, I actually do have a heart.
Continue reading Atlanta Braves File Trademark Opposition Against Disney’s Trademark Applications for “BRAVE” →

Can Coca-Cola Own Trademark Rights in the Word “Zero?”

This week’s trademark article is about one of my favorite sodas currently on the market.  It has that unmistakable Coca-Cola taste with none of the high fructose corn syrup that makes you fat.  Honestly, I have no idea why someone would choose to buy Diet Coke when Coca-Cola Zero is readily available and has so much more flavor and sweetness.  To me, Diet Coke is basically just fizzy water with just a hint of cola flavor.  If I go to a restaurant or fast food joint that offers Coke products but not Coca-Cola Zero, I always have to mix Diet Coke and Coca-Cola together so that I don’t consume a thousand calories of soda with the 4-5 free refills I’m sure to order.  Hey, I can’t help it.  I like soda.  I could have worse addictions, you know.
Continue reading Can Coca-Cola Own Trademark Rights in the Word “Zero?” →